RESTORATIVE JUSTICE FOR DISPLACED YOUTH: LEVERAGING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION TO SAFEGUARD THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN IN FORCED MIGRATION

0 out of 5

£3.99

Authors: Dmytro Slinko, Sergey Slinko

To cite this article: Slinko, D., Slinko, S. (2025) Restorative Justice For Displaced Youth: Leveraging Alternative Dispute Resolution To Safeguard The Rights Of Children In Forced Migration, Youth Voice Journal, 15(4), 75-88, ISBN (ONLINE): 978-1-80463-071-6

Description

ABSTRACT

Background: Forced displacement has a profound impact on children and adolescents, disrupting access to justice, security, and essential rights. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods— including mediation, restorative justice, and community-based conflict resolution—offer innovative, non-adversarial pathways to address these challenges, particularly within juvenile justice systems. ADR emphasizes reconciliation, empowerment, and participation, making it well-suited to the complex legal and psychosocial needs of displaced youth. Purpose: This paper explores the potential of ADR to safeguard the rights of children affected by forced migration, focusing on how these methods can prevent overcriminalization, reduce systemic discrimination, and promote social reintegration. Design/Methodology/Approach: By resolving disputes related to access to services, family reunification, and protection from exploitation in non-adversarial settings, ADR offers culturally sensitive and trauma-informed approaches that prioritize the best interests of the child. The study employs qualitative interviews, case studies from regions with large-scale displacement, and legal analysis of international frameworks to develop the RJDY-LADR framework. Findings: Drawing on global case studies, the analysis anticipates the transformative potential of restorative justice practices in rebuilding trust and social cohesion. Integrating ADR into juvenile justice frameworks addresses the psychosocial and legal needs of displaced youth, offering alternatives to detention and punitive measures. Practical implications: The findings advocate for a rights-based, restorative approach to juvenile justice, combining ADR principles with child protection standards. The framework positions displaced children as active participants in securing their rights and rebuilding their futures. Conclusions: The RJDY-LADR framework provides a scalable model for juvenile justice systems to protect displaced youth, with potential applications in diverse displacement contexts globally.

Keywords: Restorative Justice, Displaced Youth, Forced Migration, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), Juvenile Justice Systems

 

Translate »